Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Action from the endpoints - Revision history

PMA Publisher: Published from the Principia Machina source

2026-10-15T19:30:14Z

Published from the Principia Machina source

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 15 October 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Action from the endpoints}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Action from the endpoints}}
	{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/Action as a function of its endpoints}}		{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/Action as a function of its endpoints}}
			{{Hamilton's principle map}}

	This page explains Hamilton's own idea, which is not the one usually taught first.		This page explains Hamilton's own idea, which is not the one usually taught first.

BFP Rauch: Pipe internal links so cross-references read as titles, not paths

2026-09-16T04:58:55Z

Pipe internal links so cross-references read as titles, not paths

BFP Rauch: Add DISPLAYTITLE: title the page by its section rather than its path

2026-09-16T04:46:59Z

Add DISPLAYTITLE: title the page by its section rather than its path

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 16 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{DISPLAYTITLE:Action from the endpoints}}
	{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/Action as a function of its endpoints}}		{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/Action as a function of its endpoints}}

Line 136:		Line 137:
	The volume now turns to why conserved quantities exist at all, at		The volume now turns to why conserved quantities exist at all, at
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Symmetry and conservation]].		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Symmetry and conservation]].

BFP Rauch: 1 revision imported

2026-09-09T05:05:17Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:05, 9 September 2026
(No difference)

hamiltons-principle>HPVBuild: Initial import of B-14

2026-09-08T12:00:00Z

Initial import of B-14

New page

{{Technical|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/Action as a function of its endpoints}}

This page explains Hamilton's own idea, which is not the one usually taught first.
It uses no mathematics. The technical page it goes with is named above.

== Turning the question round ==

[[File:OPL-HP-F-25.png|thumb|right|400px|Action on the true motion as a function of its endpoints.]]

Everything so far has used the total cost in one way: work it out for many
different paths, and find the path where it stops changing.

Hamilton's idea was the reverse.

'''Work out the cost for the true path only. Then ask how that number depends on
where the journey started and finished.'''

That is a completely different object. It is no longer a rule about paths. It is
an ordinary quantity that depends on two places — a number attached to each pair
of start and end points.

Hamilton called it the '''characteristic function'''.

== What it knows ==

[[File:OPL-HP-F-30.png|thumb|right|400px|Lambert's theorem: chord and sum of radii.]]

The surprise is how much that single number contains.

Ask how the number changes when you move the '''finishing''' point slightly.
The answer is the momentum the object has when it arrives.

Ask how it changes when you move the '''starting''' point slightly. The answer is
the momentum it had when it set off, with the opposite sign.

So the function does not merely record a cost. Differentiating it gives you the
motion — arrival speed, departure speed, and with a little more work the timing.

Hamilton's claim was that the whole of dynamics for a system reduces to finding
this one function and differentiating it.

== Why he thought this was better ==

Hamilton was explicit about what his method does and does not offer, and he is
worth taking at his word.

He did '''not''' claim it computes faster. He said in the essay that it might well
bring no practical advantage.

What he claimed is a difference of kind. The older methods produce the
'''equations''' of motion, which then have to be solved. His method produces their
'''solution''' directly, once the function is known.

He was blunt about the older principle. Applied to finding the motion, he said, it
only gives you the differential equations, which you could get another way — and he
noted that Lagrange, Laplace and Poisson had for that reason thought it of little
use.

So the distinction to hold on to is: '''varying the path gives you the equations.
Varying the endpoints gives you their solution.'''

== Where the idea came from ==

Not from mechanics. Hamilton built this for optics first, in his work on systems
of light rays, and then transcribed it.

He says so in the opening paragraph of the dynamics essay: the dynamical
principle, he writes, is only another form of an idea already applied to optics.

He adds a remark whose reach he could not have known. The method, he suggests, is
probably not confined to optics and dynamics, and might one day become a separate
branch of analysis.

He was right in a way he had no means of anticipating. See
[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Light and particles]].

== A warning for anyone reading Hamilton ==

There is a trap here, and it catches nearly everyone.

Modern books define '''the action''' as one particular quantity. Hamilton's
characteristic function is a '''different''' quantity.

Both are called the action. Both principles built on them are called the principle
of least action. They are not the same, and the difference matters.

Anyone who opens Hamilton's 1834 essay expecting the modern quantity will misread
every equation in it. Hamilton introduced the modern one a year later, in his
second essay, as a technical improvement.

The two are explained side by side at
[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Two different actions]].

== The place it breaks ==

The characteristic function has a limitation, and it is one this volume has met
several times now.

It assumes there is '''one''' motion connecting the start and the finish. Only then
is the cost a single well-defined number.

Sometimes there is more than one. Between the poles of a sphere there are
infinitely many shortest routes, all the same length. The function has no single
value there, and differentiating it is meaningless.

Those are the '''conjugate points''' of
[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Where the minimum fails]] again, arriving in a
third guise: places where minimality fails, where the wave picture folds, and where
this function loses its meaning.

Three descriptions, one phenomenon. That recurrence is one of the reasons the
subject hangs together as well as it does.

== What Hamilton actually demonstrated ==

The 1834 essay does not stop at general claims. Hamilton works the two-body
problem — a planet round the sun — in detail with his method.

Out come the shape of the orbit, the classification into ellipse, parabola and
hyperbola, and the relation between position and time.

And out comes something less obvious: the cost of the journey depends only on
three quantities — the straight-line distance between the two positions, the sum of
their distances from the sun, and the size of the orbit. It does not depend on
where in the sky they are, or on the shape of the arc between them.

That fact is used in orbit determination to this day. It was known before Hamilton,
but his method delivers it as a remark about which quantities his function contains,
rather than as a separate calculation.

'''That is his case for the method''': not speed, but making structural facts
visible.

== Where to go next ==

The volume now turns to why conserved quantities exist at all, at
[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Symmetry and conservation]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:58, 16 September 2026
Line 74:		Line 74:

	He was right in a way he had no means of anticipating. See		He was right in a way he had no means of anticipating. See
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Light and particles]].		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Light and particles\|Light and particles]].

	== A warning for anyone reading Hamilton ==		== A warning for anyone reading Hamilton ==
Line 91:		Line 91:

	The two are explained side by side at		The two are explained side by side at
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Two different actions]].		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Two different actions\|Two different actions]].

	== The place it breaks ==		== The place it breaks ==
Line 106:		Line 106:

	Those are the '''conjugate points''' of		Those are the '''conjugate points''' of
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Where the minimum fails]] again, arriving in a		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Where the minimum fails\|Where the minimum fails]] again, arriving in a
	third guise: places where minimality fails, where the wave picture folds, and where		third guise: places where minimality fails, where the wave picture folds, and where
	this function loses its meaning.		this function loses its meaning.
Line 136:		Line 136:

	The volume now turns to why conserved quantities exist at all, at		The volume now turns to why conserved quantities exist at all, at
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Symmetry and conservation]].		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Symmetry and conservation\|Symmetry and conservation]].