Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Waves and rays - Revision history

PMA Publisher: Published from the Principia Machina source

2026-10-15T19:30:24Z

Published from the Principia Machina source

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 15 October 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Waves and rays}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Waves and rays}}
	{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/The Hamilton-Jacobi equation}}		{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/The Hamilton-Jacobi equation}}
			{{Hamilton's principle map}}

	This page explains how mechanics turned into a wave theory. It uses no		This page explains how mechanics turned into a wave theory. It uses no

BFP Rauch: Pipe internal links so cross-references read as titles, not paths

2026-09-16T04:58:54Z

Pipe internal links so cross-references read as titles, not paths

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:58, 16 September 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	[[File:OPL-HP-F-12.png\|thumb\|right\|400px\|Wavefronts and the rays orthogonal to them.]]		[[File:OPL-HP-F-12.png\|thumb\|right\|400px\|Wavefronts and the rays orthogonal to them.]]

	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/The Hamiltonian]] described motion as a flow in		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/The Hamiltonian\|the Hamiltonian]] described motion as a flow in
	a space of positions and momenta.		a space of positions and momenta.

Line 121:		Line 121:

	Those are the '''conjugate points''' of		Those are the '''conjugate points''' of
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Where the minimum fails]], seen from the wave		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Where the minimum fails\|Where the minimum fails]], seen from the wave
	side.		side.

Line 135:		Line 135:
	Hamilton's own route to all of this started from a different idea: treat the total		Hamilton's own route to all of this started from a different idea: treat the total
	cost as a function of where the journey starts and ends. It is at		cost as a function of where the journey starts and ends. It is at
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Action from the endpoints]].		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Action from the endpoints\|Action from the endpoints]].

BFP Rauch: Add DISPLAYTITLE: title the page by its section rather than its path

2026-09-16T04:46:59Z

Add DISPLAYTITLE: title the page by its section rather than its path

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 16 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{DISPLAYTITLE:Waves and rays}}
	{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/The Hamilton-Jacobi equation}}		{{Technical\|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/The Hamilton-Jacobi equation}}

Line 135:		Line 136:
	cost as a function of where the journey starts and ends. It is at		cost as a function of where the journey starts and ends. It is at
	[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Action from the endpoints]].		[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Action from the endpoints]].

BFP Rauch: 1 revision imported

2026-09-09T05:05:17Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:05, 9 September 2026
(No difference)

hamiltons-principle>HPVBuild: Initial import of B-13

2026-09-08T12:00:00Z

Initial import of B-13

New page

{{Technical|Hamilton's principle/Mathematics/The Hamilton-Jacobi equation}}

This page explains how mechanics turned into a wave theory. It uses no
mathematics. The technical page it goes with is named above.

== Looking for the easiest description ==

[[File:OPL-HP-F-12.png|thumb|right|400px|Wavefronts and the rays orthogonal to them.]]

[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/The Hamiltonian]] described motion as a flow in
a space of positions and momenta.

Some descriptions make that flow simple and others make it complicated. So it is
natural to ask for the best one — a description in which nothing appears to move
at all, and every quantity stays put.

Such a description exists. All the difficulty moves into '''finding''' it, and the
finding is a single equation.

That equation replaces every other equation of motion for the system. Solve it
and the entire problem is done, by differentiating rather than by integrating.

This is Hamilton's method, refined by Jacobi in the 1840s. It is not usually the
quickest way to solve a particular problem. Its importance is what it revealed.

== Fronts and paths ==

[[File:OPL-HP-F-32.png|thumb|right|400px|From n second-order equations to one partial differential equation.]]

The equation has a picture attached, and the picture is the point.

Drop a stone in a pond. Ripples spread out in rings. The rings are '''wavefronts'''.

Now draw arrows pointing outward, at right angles to the rings, showing the
direction the disturbance travels. Those are '''rays'''.

Fronts and rays are two descriptions of one thing. Give the fronts and the rays
follow, since rays cross fronts at right angles. Give the rays and the fronts
follow.

'''Hamilton's equation is the equation for the fronts.''' The trajectories of
mechanics are the rays.

So a moving particle can be described either as a thing following a path, or as
one ray of a family of surfaces sweeping through space.

== The same equation twice ==

[[File:OPL-HP-F-50.png|thumb|right|400px|Rays crossing a focus.]]

Here is what makes this more than a picture.

Optics already had an equation for wavefronts of light travelling through material
that bends it.

Hamilton's equation for mechanical motion is the '''same equation'''. Not similar.
The same, with one substitution: whatever plays the role of the bending power of
the material corresponds to the energy available to the particle.

A particle rolling through a landscape of hills and valleys behaves exactly like
light through glass of varying density.

Hamilton knew this because he did the optics first. His mechanics is a
transcription of it.

== The gap ==

Now the observation that matters, and it went unexploited for ninety-two years.

Fronts and rays are not the whole of optics. They are the '''approximation''' that
works when the wavelength is very small compared with everything else. Rays are
what waves look like when the waves are fine enough that you cannot see them
waving.

When the wavelength is not small, rays fail. Light bends round corners, spreads
through small openings, and produces interference patterns. None of that is in the
ray picture.

So: if mechanics is the same as ray optics, and ray optics is an approximation to
wave optics, then '''mechanics ought to be an approximation to a wave mechanics
too'''.

The logic is not subtle. It is available to anyone who notices the two equations
are identical.

== Why nobody took it up ==

Nothing suggested it was worth pursuing.

To have waves you need a wavelength, and nobody had seen the slightest hint of a
wavelength for a moving object. There was no experiment that ray mechanics failed
to explain. There was nothing to be waving.

The analogy sat complete and idle from 1834 to 1926.

== Filling it in ==

Schrödinger took it up in 1926, and worked backwards.

Suppose the wave exists. Suppose classical mechanics is what it looks like when
the wavelength is negligible. What equation must the wave obey?

Running that requirement through the mathematics produces one answer, and it is
the equation at the foundation of quantum mechanics.

It was not guessed. It was constructed, by taking Hamilton's analogy seriously and
insisting that the missing corner of the table be filled in.

The wavelength turns out to be tiny for anything you can see, and comparable to
the size of an atom for an electron. That is why the ray picture works so well for
cricket balls and fails completely for electrons.

== A place where both pictures fail ==

One more thing, and it connects back to earlier pages.

Where rays come back together — at a focus — the front folds over on itself and the
description breaks down. Several rays arrive at one place, and the simple picture
of one front passing through cannot hold.

Those are the '''conjugate points''' of
[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Where the minimum fails]], seen from the wave
side.

The ray picture predicts infinite brightness at a focus, which is wrong. The wave
picture gives a finite, bright, structured spot. The ray description is worst
exactly where the interesting thing happens.

That pattern is general. The approximation fails precisely at the places the full
theory finds most significant.

== Where to go next ==

Hamilton's own route to all of this started from a different idea: treat the total
cost as a function of where the journey starts and ends. It is at
[[Hamilton's principle/Explainers/Action from the endpoints]].