PMA Publisher: Published from the Principia Machina source

2026-10-15T19:30:41Z

Published from the Principia Machina source

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 15 October 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:What the Standard Model conserves}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:What the Standard Model conserves}}
			{{Noether's theorems map}}

	''Mathematical counterpart: [[Noether's theorems/Applications/The conserved currents of the Standard Model\|The conserved currents of the Standard Model]].''		''Mathematical counterpart: [[Noether's theorems/Applications/The conserved currents of the Standard Model\|The conserved currents of the Standard Model]].''
Line 99:		Line 100:
	''No mathematics is used on this page. The mathematical treatment is on the		''No mathematics is used on this page. The mathematical treatment is on the
	counterpart page named above.''		counterpart page named above.''

BFP Rauch: 1 revision imported

2026-09-10T13:29:55Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:29, 10 September 2026
(No difference)

NT>NoetherVolumeBuild: Noether theorems volume, initial import (B-31)

2026-09-10T00:00:00Z

Noether theorems volume, initial import (B-31)

New page

{{DISPLAYTITLE:What the Standard Model conserves}}

''Mathematical counterpart: [[Noether's theorems/Applications/The conserved currents of the Standard Model|The conserved currents of the Standard Model]].''

'''A note about this page.''' Its counterpart describes and derives nothing, so
this one does the same. The two structural statements below are secure. Everything
specific about the Standard Model is reported as it is usually stated, not as
anything checked here.

== What holds no matter what the theory contains ==

Two results carry over from earlier in this volume and need nothing about
particles at all.

'''The counting.''' A theory with symmetries you can dial differently at every
point has exactly as many redundancies as it has such dials. That many identities
among its equations, that many equations following from the rest, that much
description that means nothing. From
[[Noether's theorems/Explainers/Counting the equations a gauge theory really has|the
counting page]], and independent of what is being described.

'''The forcing.''' Anything coupled to such a symmetry must be conserved, or the
equations have no solutions. Not permitted — required. This came out of a
one-line argument about antisymmetry and carries across untouched.

Both apply to the Standard Model exactly as they apply to electromagnetism, and
neither needed to be re-derived when the Standard Model was written down.

== What is usually said, and is not checked here ==

'''Unchecked, all of the following.''' The Standard Model is built on three local
symmetries of different sizes, whose conserved quantities are the electric charge,
the weak charges and the colour charges. Alongside those it has global symmetries
whose conserved quantities are the various particle-counting numbers — how many
protons and neutrons, how many electrons, and so on.

None of that is derived in this volume, and the counterpart page declines to state
it as established for the same reason.

== The point this volume can actually make ==

It is not which currents the theory has. It is that '''nothing new was needed to
know what shape they would take'''.

When physicists build a candidate theory of some force, they choose a symmetry
first. The moment that choice is made, the count of conserved currents is fixed,
the count of redundant equations is fixed, and the requirement that the coupled
matter conserve those currents is fixed. All of it follows from a theorem proved
before any of the relevant physics existed.

'''The theorem is not used to check the answer afterwards. It is used to constrain
the question beforehand.'''

== One qualification that is not optional ==

Everything above is classical.

A symmetry of the classical theory need not survive the move to quantum mechanics,
and where it does not, a classically conserved quantity is simply not conserved.
The particle-counting numbers are the standard example of quantities affected by
this.

Worse, if a '''local''' symmetry fails to survive, the theory does not merely lose
a conservation law — it stops making sense, because the redundancy in its
description was never supposed to be physical and now leaks into the predictions.

Checking that this does not happen is one of the first things done to any
candidate theory, and several features of the known particles are the way they are
because nothing else would pass the check. See
[[Noether's theorems/Explainers/When a symmetry does not survive|When a symmetry
does not survive]].

== Exact, approximate, and merely apparent ==

The conserved quantities of the Standard Model are not all conserved in the same
sense, and the differences matter.

'''Tied to a local symmetry.''' Electric charge and the colour charges. These are
the most secure things in the theory. As
[[Noether's theorems/Explainers/Counting the equations a gauge theory really has|the
counting page]] showed, a local symmetry does not merely permit the conservation
of what couples to it — it requires it, on pain of the equations having no
solutions at all. A violation would not be a surprising measurement; it would be
an inconsistent theory.

'''Tied to a global symmetry.''' The particle-counting numbers. These come from
the first theorem in its ordinary form. They are conserved because the scoring
rule happens to have a symmetry, and nothing forces the scoring rule to have it.
A more complete theory could easily not.

'''Apparent.''' Some quantities look conserved because every process that would
violate them is too slow or too weak to have been seen. That is a statement about
experiments, not about symmetry, and it is the category most likely to be revised.

'''The three look identical in a table of conserved quantities and are entirely
different claims.''' Knowing which is which is one of the more useful things the
two theorems provide, and it is invisible unless you ask where each came from.

''No mathematics is used on this page. The mathematical treatment is on the
counterpart page named above.''

Noether's theorems/Explainers/What the Standard Model conserves - Revision history

PMA Publisher: Published from the Principia Machina source

BFP Rauch: 1 revision imported

NT>NoetherVolumeBuild: Noether theorems volume, initial import (B-31)