BFP Rauch: 1 revision imported

2026-09-10T13:29:56Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:29, 10 September 2026
(No difference)

NT>NoetherVolumeBuild: Noether theorems volume, initial import (H-07)

2026-09-10T00:00:00Z

Noether theorems volume, initial import (H-07)

New page

{{DISPLAYTITLE:The long neglect}}

It is generally said that Noether's paper went largely unused in physics for
some decades after 1918. This page states what is actually established about
that, which is less than the claim.

== What is not established ==

'''No citation trace of the 1918 paper across the interval was performed for
this volume.''' The question of how often, by whom, and in what connection the
paper was cited between 1918 and the middle of the century is open, and nothing
below should be read as answering it.

One nearby figure exists and is easy to misuse. Bessel-Hagen's 1921 paper, which
applies Noether's theorems to electrodynamics, drew its first proper citation in
1934 and few afterwards for twenty years. That is a fact about
[[Noether's theorems/History/Bessel-Hagen and the first uses|his paper]]. It is
not a fact about hers, and transferring it would be an error of exactly the kind
this volume marks elsewhere.

== What the secondary literature proposes ==

Several explanations circulate. They are recorded here as claims, with no
verdict, because none has been checked against a citation record.

The paper appeared in a mathematics journal, in the idiom of the formal calculus
of variations and Lie group theory. A physicist looking for a result about
conservation laws would not have found it easily and might not have read it
through if he had.

Its most famous consequences were not news. Energy, momentum and angular
momentum were already known to be conserved. A theorem whose visible output is
results already in hand looks, from a distance, like a re-derivation.

The physics that needed the second theorem did not yet exist. Gauge theories
with non-abelian structure were built in the 1950s. Before them, the only theory
whose energy relations were degenerate in the way the second theorem describes
was general relativity, and interest in that particular question subsided in the
early 1920s once it became clear no local answer was coming.

Noether herself did not return to the subject. She turned to abstract algebra
and the work she is chiefly known for, and left no later exposition of the 1918
paper to point readers toward it.

The paper had no accessible translation. The first English version appeared in
1971.

== Two cautions about the claim itself ==

'''Neglect is a comparative word and the comparison is usually left out.'''
Neglected by physicists, or by mathematicians? The variational-calculus
literature is not obviously the same story as the physics literature, and the
usual account collapses them.

'''"Unused" is not "unknown".''' Hilbert cited her by name in his 1924
consolidated reprint and credited her with the general proof. Klein's collected
works, published in 1921, carry a footnote stating both her theorems. Pauli's
relativity article of the same period is in the same milieu. Whatever the
citation count says, the people who had asked the question knew who had answered
it. A claim of neglect has to be reconciled with that.

== What would close this ==

A citation trace of ''Invariante Variationsprobleme'' across 1918 to 1960,
separated by discipline, and read against the reprint history — the 1921 Klein
collected works, the 1924 Hilbert reprint, the 1983 Noether collected papers.
Until that exists, the verdict here is UNCOMPUTED, and the reason is that the
work has not been done, not that it cannot be.

''Provenance: this page contains no verbatim quotation and asserts no citation
count for Noether's paper. The proposed explanations are recorded from the
secondary literature as claims. See [[Noether's theorems/Sources|Sources]].''

Noether's theorems/History/The long neglect - Revision history

BFP Rauch: 1 revision imported

NT>NoetherVolumeBuild: Noether theorems volume, initial import (H-07)