<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://invarians.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Noether%27s_theorems%2FMathematics%2FThe_Belinfante-Rosenfeld_improvement</id>
	<title>Noether&#039;s theorems/Mathematics/The Belinfante-Rosenfeld improvement - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://invarians.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Noether%27s_theorems%2FMathematics%2FThe_Belinfante-Rosenfeld_improvement"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://invarians.org/index.php?title=Noether%27s_theorems/Mathematics/The_Belinfante-Rosenfeld_improvement&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-21T13:01:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://invarians.org/index.php?title=Noether%27s_theorems/Mathematics/The_Belinfante-Rosenfeld_improvement&amp;diff=565&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>BFP Rauch: 1 revision imported</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://invarians.org/index.php?title=Noether%27s_theorems/Mathematics/The_Belinfante-Rosenfeld_improvement&amp;diff=565&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-10T13:29:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw-interface=&quot;&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:29, 10 September 2026&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-notice&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BFP Rauch</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://invarians.org/index.php?title=Noether%27s_theorems/Mathematics/The_Belinfante-Rosenfeld_improvement&amp;diff=564&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>NT&gt;NoetherVolumeBuild: Noether theorems volume, initial import (M-06)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://invarians.org/index.php?title=Noether%27s_theorems/Mathematics/The_Belinfante-Rosenfeld_improvement&amp;diff=564&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-10T00:00:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Noether theorems volume, initial import (M-06)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE:The Belinfante-Rosenfeld improvement}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Plain-language counterpart: [[Noether&amp;#039;s theorems/Explainers/Moving the bookkeeping without changing the total|Moving the bookkeeping without changing the total]].&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NT-F-11.png|thumb|right|360px|alt=Two bar charts of equal total area. The left, the canonical stress-energy assignment, has uneven bars; the right, the improved assignment, has evened ones. An arrow joins them. The caption states that the total and the conservation law are unchanged and only the distribution differs.|The Belinfante improvement as a redistribution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stress-energy tensor the first theorem produces has two defects, and one&lt;br /&gt;
standard repair. This page derives why the repair is allowed, and flags what it&lt;br /&gt;
does not derive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The defect ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apply the first theorem to translations in space and time. The currents assemble&lt;br /&gt;
into a two-index object, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;canonical&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; stress-energy tensor&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T^{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, satisfying&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\partial_{a}T^{ab}=0\qquad\qquad\mathrm{(1)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
on solutions. Two things are wrong with it for the purposes of general&lt;br /&gt;
relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not symmetric in general. And it is not unique, since&lt;br /&gt;
[[Noether&amp;#039;s theorems/First theorem/The Noether current and the Noether charge|the&lt;br /&gt;
current page]] showed that any current admits additions with identically&lt;br /&gt;
vanishing divergence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General relativity needs a symmetric tensor, because the object appearing on the&lt;br /&gt;
right of Einstein&amp;#039;s equations is symmetric by construction. So the canonical&lt;br /&gt;
tensor as delivered cannot be the one that couples to gravity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why an improvement is allowed, derived ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T^{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the divergence of a three-index object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T^{ab}\ \longrightarrow\ T^{ab}+\partial_{c}S^{cab}\qquad\qquad\mathrm{(2)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
subject to one condition, that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is antisymmetric in its first two&lt;br /&gt;
indices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S^{cab}=-S^{acb}\qquad\qquad\mathrm{(3)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Take the divergence of the added term:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\partial_{a}\partial_{c}S^{cab}=0\qquad\qquad\mathrm{(4)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\partial_{a}\partial_{c}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is symmetric under interchange of&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, while &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S^{cab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is antisymmetric&lt;br /&gt;
under it by (3), and the contraction of a symmetric with an antisymmetric object&lt;br /&gt;
vanishes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So (1) still holds after (2). &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The conservation law survives the change&lt;br /&gt;
identically&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, not merely on solutions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The charges survive too. The added contribution to a charge is an integral of&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\partial_{c}S^{cab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; over a slice, which reduces to a surface term at&lt;br /&gt;
infinity and vanishes for fields falling off there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Same conservation law, same total, different distribution.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The improvement&lt;br /&gt;
moves energy and momentum around within the system without changing what flows or&lt;br /&gt;
how much there is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The construction, not derived ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;UNVERIFIED.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; That an &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S^{cab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; satisfying (3) can always be chosen&lt;br /&gt;
so that the improved tensor is symmetric — the Belinfante-Rosenfeld construction,&lt;br /&gt;
built from the spin current supplied by the first theorem applied to rotations —&lt;br /&gt;
is stated in the literature and is not derived here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deriving it requires the rotation currents for fields carrying spin, which this&lt;br /&gt;
volume does not set up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The point that is usually missed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The non-uniqueness is a property of the theorem, not a defect of a&lt;br /&gt;
derivation.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Noether&amp;#039;s proof determines the current up to exactly this freedom, and says so:&lt;br /&gt;
the corollary at the end of&lt;br /&gt;
[[Noether&amp;#039;s theorems/Second theorem/The second theorem stated and proved|the&lt;br /&gt;
second theorem&amp;#039;s proof]] produces a non-vanishing function system whose&lt;br /&gt;
divergence vanishes identically, which is the freedom (2) arriving as an output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the improvement is not a repair of Noether&amp;#039;s result. It is a choice made&lt;br /&gt;
within a latitude her result already exhibited, and the criterion for the choice —&lt;br /&gt;
symmetry — comes from general relativity rather than from the theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Provenance: (1) to (4) are standard and (4) is derived above. The construction&lt;br /&gt;
of a symmetrising &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is flagged UNVERIFIED. The connection to the&lt;br /&gt;
corollary of Noether&amp;#039;s second-theorem proof is read from the public-domain German&lt;br /&gt;
original. See [[Noether&amp;#039;s theorems/Sources|Sources]].&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>NT&gt;NoetherVolumeBuild</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>