Jump to content

The Principia Machina/Diagrams/07 Strike-rule flow: Difference between revisions

From The Invariance Itself
m 1 revision imported
Human-facing page: 07 Strike-rule flow
Line 6: Line 6:
* GENERATED FROM: static, TPS 4.4
* GENERATED FROM: static, TPS 4.4
* STATUS: hand-authored at TPS 0.1.0; superseded by TPX at its first build
* STATUS: hand-authored at TPS 0.1.0; superseded by TPX at its first build
* SOURCE SHA-256: <code>78f1e0d98d09b71f794e6085ecf3b90e987249d54676649f12cb27dfcb71a50d</code>
* SOURCE SHA-256: <code>deae5024e698dec8c17f35bcd9834d302d8856c4a8147950f5ac17b664a33c1f</code>


Rendered live from the source, which is the text equivalent and is shown under the drawing. The key to the shapes is in the panel.
Rendered live from the source, which is the text equivalent and is shown under the drawing. The key to the shapes is in the panel.
Line 12: Line 12:
<onlyinclude><div style="clear:both; overflow-x:auto; max-width:100%; border:1px solid #c8ccd1; background:#ffffff; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em 0;">
<onlyinclude><div style="clear:both; overflow-x:auto; max-width:100%; border:1px solid #c8ccd1; background:#ffffff; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em 0;">
{{#mermaid:
{{#mermaid:
%% 07 Strike-rule flow. process/Mermaid flow. Generated from: static, TPS 4.4.
%% 07 Strike-rule flow. process/Mermaid flow. Static, TPS 4.4.
flowchart TD
flowchart TD
   R[(record r with FINDING,<br/>ASSUMPTIONS, REGIME)] --> S1[SR1: does FINDING with the TFK<br/>derive a contradiction?]
   R[(record r with its fields)] --> S1[SR1: contradicts the TFK?]
   S1 -- yes --> X1[(struck at CAC<br/>without ranking)]
   S1 -- yes --> X1[(struck without ranking)]
   S1 -- no --> S2[SR2: derivation valid and<br/>no standing record contradicts?]
   S1 -- no --> S2[SR2: valid and uncontradicted?]
   S2 -- yes --> ST[(stands)]
   S2 -- yes --> ST[(stands)]
   S2 -- contradiction --> S3[SR3: regime test<br/>L-L, M-M with k, or L-M]
   S2 -- contradiction --> S3[SR3: regime test]
   S3 --> S7[SR7: M contradiction<br/>against an L record?]
   S3 --> S7[SR7: M against an L record?]
   S7 -- yes, a of r above 0 --> G[(named gap<br/>against ASSUMPTIONS)]
   S7 -- yes, a of r above 0 --> G[(named gap on ASSUMPTIONS)]
   S7 -- yes, a of r is 0 --> DM[/DOMAIN restriction or<br/>successor container,<br/>declared by a human/]
   S7 -- yes, a of r is 0 --> DM[/DOMAIN restriction or successor/]
   S7 -- no --> S4[SR4: distance<br/>d = a of r, s of r]
   S7 -- no --> S4[SR4: distance d]
   S4 --> S5[SR5: smaller d stands;<br/>other struck; locus recorded]
   S4 --> S5[SR5: the closer record stands]
   S5 -- equal d --> AB[audit block]
   S5 -- equal d --> AB[audit block]
   S4 --> S6[SR6: independent<br/>contradictions counted]
   S4 --> S6[SR6: independent contradictions]
   S6 -- n_ind reaches N_x --> AB
   S6 -- count reaches N_x --> AB
   AB --> DI[/decision item: strike r,<br/>restrict DOMAIN, or find<br/>against the contradictions/]
   AB --> DI[/decision item to the human/]


   classDef task fill:#eaecf0,stroke:#a2a9b1,color:#202122
   classDef task fill:#eaecf0,stroke:#a2a9b1,color:#202122
Line 44: Line 44:
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<pre>
<pre>
%% 07 Strike-rule flow. process/Mermaid flow. Generated from: static, TPS 4.4.
%% 07 Strike-rule flow. process/Mermaid flow. Static, TPS 4.4.
flowchart TD
flowchart TD
   R[(record r with FINDING,<br/>ASSUMPTIONS, REGIME)] --> S1[SR1: does FINDING with the TFK<br/>derive a contradiction?]
   R[(record r with its fields)] --> S1[SR1: contradicts the TFK?]
   S1 -- yes --> X1[(struck at CAC<br/>without ranking)]
   S1 -- yes --> X1[(struck without ranking)]
   S1 -- no --> S2[SR2: derivation valid and<br/>no standing record contradicts?]
   S1 -- no --> S2[SR2: valid and uncontradicted?]
   S2 -- yes --> ST[(stands)]
   S2 -- yes --> ST[(stands)]
   S2 -- contradiction --> S3[SR3: regime test<br/>L-L, M-M with k, or L-M]
   S2 -- contradiction --> S3[SR3: regime test]
   S3 --> S7[SR7: M contradiction<br/>against an L record?]
   S3 --> S7[SR7: M against an L record?]
   S7 -- yes, a of r above 0 --> G[(named gap<br/>against ASSUMPTIONS)]
   S7 -- yes, a of r above 0 --> G[(named gap on ASSUMPTIONS)]
   S7 -- yes, a of r is 0 --> DM[/DOMAIN restriction or<br/>successor container,<br/>declared by a human/]
   S7 -- yes, a of r is 0 --> DM[/DOMAIN restriction or successor/]
   S7 -- no --> S4[SR4: distance<br/>d = a of r, s of r]
   S7 -- no --> S4[SR4: distance d]
   S4 --> S5[SR5: smaller d stands;<br/>other struck; locus recorded]
   S4 --> S5[SR5: the closer record stands]
   S5 -- equal d --> AB[audit block]
   S5 -- equal d --> AB[audit block]
   S4 --> S6[SR6: independent<br/>contradictions counted]
   S4 --> S6[SR6: independent contradictions]
   S6 -- n_ind reaches N_x --> AB
   S6 -- count reaches N_x --> AB
   AB --> DI[/decision item: strike r,<br/>restrict DOMAIN, or find<br/>against the contradictions/]
   AB --> DI[/decision item to the human/]


   classDef task fill:#eaecf0,stroke:#a2a9b1,color:#202122
   classDef task fill:#eaecf0,stroke:#a2a9b1,color:#202122

Revision as of 04:14, 18 September 2026

The Principia Machina: map
Reading the diagrams
Structure key
Process key
Definition of terms
Roles
Reading by audience
Start here: the walk through
The operator's guide
Tutorial: create a UUID Workspace Container (UWC)
Public Recorder inputs
Sponsors: your first agent
The specification
Contents: parts, tables, diagrams
TPS 0.5.0 (declared 2026-10-03, revision 8; machine-optimized text)
Decisions (the foundations record, one line each)


Structural diagram 7 of 12. Part of the TPM hub.

  • KIND: process
  • LANGUAGE: Mermaid
  • GENERATED FROM: static, TPS 4.4
  • STATUS: hand-authored at TPS 0.1.0; superseded by TPX at its first build
  • SOURCE SHA-256: deae5024e698dec8c17f35bcd9834d302d8856c4a8147950f5ac17b664a33c1f

Rendered live from the source, which is the text equivalent and is shown under the drawing. The key to the shapes is in the panel.

Source (the text equivalent; Mermaid)
%% 07 Strike-rule flow. process/Mermaid flow. Static, TPS 4.4.
flowchart TD
  R[(record r with its fields)] --> S1[SR1: contradicts the TFK?]
  S1 -- yes --> X1[(struck without ranking)]
  S1 -- no --> S2[SR2: valid and uncontradicted?]
  S2 -- yes --> ST[(stands)]
  S2 -- contradiction --> S3[SR3: regime test]
  S3 --> S7[SR7: M against an L record?]
  S7 -- yes, a of r above 0 --> G[(named gap on ASSUMPTIONS)]
  S7 -- yes, a of r is 0 --> DM[/DOMAIN restriction or successor/]
  S7 -- no --> S4[SR4: distance d]
  S4 --> S5[SR5: the closer record stands]
  S5 -- equal d --> AB[audit block]
  S4 --> S6[SR6: independent contradictions]
  S6 -- count reaches N_x --> AB
  AB --> DI[/decision item to the human/]

  classDef task fill:#eaecf0,stroke:#a2a9b1,color:#202122
  classDef human fill:#eaf3ff,stroke:#36c,color:#202122
  classDef data fill:#fef6e7,stroke:#ac6600,color:#202122
  classDef bad fill:#fee7e6,stroke:#d33,color:#202122
  classDef good fill:#d5fdf4,stroke:#14866d,color:#202122
  class S1,S2,S3,S4,S5,S6,S7,AB task
  class DM,DI human
  class R,G data
  class ST good
  class X1 bad

Text equivalent

A record enters with FINDING, ASSUMPTIONS and REGIME. SR1 strikes it without ranking if its FINDING with the TFK derives a contradiction. SR2 lets it stand while its derivation is valid and nothing standing contradicts it. On a contradiction, SR3 applies the regime test; SR7 protects an L derivation from an M contradiction, recording a named gap when a(r) is above 0 or, when a(r) is 0, a DOMAIN finding declared by a human. Otherwise SR4 computes distance and SR5 keeps the closer record; equal distance opens an audit block, and SR6 opens one when independent contradictions reach N_x. The audit block ends in a decision item (4.4, 4.1.5).