Jump to content

The Principia Machina/Diagrams/07 Strike-rule flow: Difference between revisions

From The Invariance Itself
m 1 revision imported: TPM bootstrap under PMP-TPM 0.2.0
m Add live rendering (graphviz tag / #mermaid) above the text-equivalent source; PMP-TPM diagrams, 2026-09-16
Line 6: Line 6:
* STATUS: hand-authored at PMP-TPM 0.2.0 from foundations record 0.5.0 section 4.1; superseded by TPX at its first build (D21, structural diagram pages are TPX output).
* STATUS: hand-authored at PMP-TPM 0.2.0 from foundations record 0.5.0 section 4.1; superseded by TPX at its first build (D21, structural diagram pages are TPX output).


The source below is the text equivalent of the diagram. Rendering requires a Mermaid extension; without one the source is shown as text, which 4.1 accepts.
The diagram is rendered live from the source below, which is its text equivalent (4.1). If rendering is unavailable the source still stands.
 
{{#mermaid:flowchart TD
  R[Record r at CAC] --> SR1{SR1: FINDING with TFK derives a contradiction?}
  SR1 -- yes --> STRUCK1[Struck without ranking]
  SR1 -- no --> SR2{SR2: derivation from TFK plus ASSUMPTIONS valid?}
  SR2 -- no --> STRUCK1
  SR2 -- yes --> C{Standing record contradicts r?}
  C -- no --> STANDS[r stands]
  C -- yes --> REG[SR3: apply regime test L-L, M-M after SR8 scaling, or L-M]
  REG -- no contradiction survives --> STANDS
  REG -- contradiction --> SR7{SR7: M contradiction against L derivation?}
  SR7 -- yes, a r greater than 0 --> GAP[Named gap against r's ASSUMPTIONS; r stands]
  SR7 -- yes, a r equals 0 --> DOM[Finding against TFK DOMAIN; human declares restriction or successor]
  SR7 -- no --> SR4[SR4: d r = a r, s r lexicographic]
  SR4 --> SR5{SR5: compare d}
  SR5 -- r closer --> OTHER[Other record struck; locus recorded]
  SR5 -- r farther --> SR6{SR6: independent contradictions n_ind r >= N_x?}
  SR5 -- equal --> AUDIT[Audit block; decision item]
  SR6 -- no --> STRUCKR[r struck; its extra ASSUMPTIONS are the locus]
  SR6 -- yes --> AUDIT
}}


<pre>
<pre>
Line 29: Line 50:
   SR6 -- yes --&gt; AUDIT
   SR6 -- yes --&gt; AUDIT
</pre>
</pre>

Revision as of 13:01, 16 September 2026

Structural diagram 7 of 12. Part of the TPM hub.

  • KIND: process
  • LANGUAGE: Mermaid flow
  • GENERATED FROM: static, D16
  • STATUS: hand-authored at PMP-TPM 0.2.0 from foundations record 0.5.0 section 4.1; superseded by TPX at its first build (D21, structural diagram pages are TPX output).

The diagram is rendered live from the source below, which is its text equivalent (4.1). If rendering is unavailable the source still stands.

flowchart TD
  R[Record r at CAC] --> SR1{SR1: FINDING with TFK derives a contradiction?}
  SR1 -- yes --> STRUCK1[Struck without ranking]
  SR1 -- no --> SR2{SR2: derivation from TFK plus ASSUMPTIONS valid?}
  SR2 -- no --> STRUCK1
  SR2 -- yes --> C{Standing record contradicts r?}
  C -- no --> STANDS[r stands]
  C -- yes --> REG[SR3: apply regime test L-L, M-M after SR8 scaling, or L-M]
  REG -- no contradiction survives --> STANDS
  REG -- contradiction --> SR7{SR7: M contradiction against L derivation?}
  SR7 -- yes, a r greater than 0 --> GAP[Named gap against r's ASSUMPTIONS; r stands]
  SR7 -- yes, a r equals 0 --> DOM[Finding against TFK DOMAIN; human declares restriction or successor]
  SR7 -- no --> SR4[SR4: d r = a r, s r lexicographic]
  SR4 --> SR5{SR5: compare d}
  SR5 -- r closer --> OTHER[Other record struck; locus recorded]
  SR5 -- r farther --> SR6{SR6: independent contradictions n_ind r >= N_x?}
  SR5 -- equal --> AUDIT[Audit block; decision item]
  SR6 -- no --> STRUCKR[r struck; its extra ASSUMPTIONS are the locus]
  SR6 -- yes --> AUDIT