Jump to content

The Principia Machina/Diagrams/04 CAC check flow: Difference between revisions

From The Invariance Itself
m 1 revision imported
Diagram layer page 04 CAC check flow, TPS 0.1.0
Line 7: Line 7:
* KEY: [[The Principia Machina/Diagrams/Key for process diagrams|key for process diagrams]]: what each shape and arrow means; [[The Principia Machina/Diagrams/Terms|definition of terms]]; [[The Principia Machina/TPS 0.1.0/Contents|contents of the specification]]
* KEY: [[The Principia Machina/Diagrams/Key for process diagrams|key for process diagrams]]: what each shape and arrow means; [[The Principia Machina/Diagrams/Terms|definition of terms]]; [[The Principia Machina/TPS 0.1.0/Contents|contents of the specification]]


Rendered live from the source below, which is the text equivalent; if rendering is unavailable the source still stands.
Rendered live from the source, which is the text equivalent and is shown under the drawing; a wide drawing scrolls sideways inside its frame.


<div style="overflow-x:auto; max-width:100%; border:1px solid #c8ccd1; background:#ffffff; padding:0.5em;">
{{#mermaid:
{{#mermaid:
%% 04 CAC check flow. process/Mermaid flow. Generated from: static, TPS 4.2 check list, 4.1.3.
%% 04 CAC check flow. process/Mermaid flow. Generated from: static, TPS 4.2 check list, 4.1.3.
Line 33: Line 34:
   class I bad
   class I bad
|config.theme=neutral}}
|config.theme=neutral}}
</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border:1px solid #c8ccd1; padding:0.3em;">'''Source''' (the text equivalent; Mermaid)
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<pre>
%% 04 CAC check flow. process/Mermaid flow. Generated from: static, TPS 4.2 check list, 4.1.3.
flowchart TD
  A[zone checks: T1-T6,<br/>four isomorphism checks,<br/>SR9 C1-C5<br/>rows 34, 35, 17, 18] --> B[digests D-TPK, D-TrM,<br/>D-TMS, D-TFK<br/>row 2]
  B --> C[prefix unique across TPM<br/>row 14]
  C --> D[assumptions atomic<br/>row 23]
  D --> E[regime assigned, L or M<br/>row 19]
  E --> F[every record checked against<br/>the register and the master record<br/>4.1.2]
  F --> G[contradiction tests SR3,<br/>distance SR4, ordering SR5,<br/>independence count SR6<br/>rows 20, 21, 22, 24]
  G -- all pass --> H[(candidate certificate<br/>to staging<br/>5.5.3)]
  G -- strike --> I[(WITHDRAWAL record<br/>4.6.1)]
  G -- equal distance, N_x reached,<br/>or gold-standard case --> J[audit block:<br/>ends in a decision item<br/>4.1.5]
  A -- rejected component --> K[/returned to the author<br/>5.5.2/]
  classDef task fill:#eaecf0,stroke:#a2a9b1,color:#202122
  classDef human fill:#eaf3ff,stroke:#36c,color:#202122
  classDef data fill:#fef6e7,stroke:#ac6600,color:#202122
  classDef bad fill:#fee7e6,stroke:#d33,color:#202122
  classDef good fill:#d5fdf4,stroke:#14866d,color:#202122
  class A,B,C,D,E,F,G,J task
  class K human
  class H good
  class I bad
</pre>
</div></div>


== Text equivalent ==
== Text equivalent ==

Revision as of 20:38, 17 September 2026

Structural diagram 4 of 12. Part of the TPM hub.

Rendered live from the source, which is the text equivalent and is shown under the drawing; a wide drawing scrolls sideways inside its frame.

Source (the text equivalent; Mermaid)
%% 04 CAC check flow. process/Mermaid flow. Generated from: static, TPS 4.2 check list, 4.1.3.
flowchart TD
  A[zone checks: T1-T6,<br/>four isomorphism checks,<br/>SR9 C1-C5<br/>rows 34, 35, 17, 18] --> B[digests D-TPK, D-TrM,<br/>D-TMS, D-TFK<br/>row 2]
  B --> C[prefix unique across TPM<br/>row 14]
  C --> D[assumptions atomic<br/>row 23]
  D --> E[regime assigned, L or M<br/>row 19]
  E --> F[every record checked against<br/>the register and the master record<br/>4.1.2]
  F --> G[contradiction tests SR3,<br/>distance SR4, ordering SR5,<br/>independence count SR6<br/>rows 20, 21, 22, 24]
  G -- all pass --> H[(candidate certificate<br/>to staging<br/>5.5.3)]
  G -- strike --> I[(WITHDRAWAL record<br/>4.6.1)]
  G -- equal distance, N_x reached,<br/>or gold-standard case --> J[audit block:<br/>ends in a decision item<br/>4.1.5]
  A -- rejected component --> K[/returned to the author<br/>5.5.2/]

  classDef task fill:#eaecf0,stroke:#a2a9b1,color:#202122
  classDef human fill:#eaf3ff,stroke:#36c,color:#202122
  classDef data fill:#fef6e7,stroke:#ac6600,color:#202122
  classDef bad fill:#fee7e6,stroke:#d33,color:#202122
  classDef good fill:#d5fdf4,stroke:#14866d,color:#202122
  class A,B,C,D,E,F,G,J task
  class K human
  class H good
  class I bad

Text equivalent

At certification the CAC runs the zone checks (4.2 rows 34, 35, 17, 18), the digests (row 2), prefix uniqueness (row 14), atomicity of assumptions (row 23) and regime assignment (row 19), then checks every record against the register and the master record (4.1.2) and applies SR3 to SR6 (rows 20, 21, 22, 24). All passing yields the candidate certificate (5.5.3); a contradiction yields a withdrawal record (4.6.1); equal distance, a reached N_x or a gold-standard case opens an audit block ending in a decision item (4.1.5). A rejected component returns to its author (5.5.2).