The Principia Machina/GTP/Conformance: Difference between revisions
m 1 revision imported |
CO-4 rebuilt against PMP-TPM 0.13.0 (D185.1 (c); D174.1): relabel and mirror update |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 01:01, 27 September 2026
| The Principia Machina: map |
|---|
| Reading the diagrams Structure key Process key Definition of terms Roles |
| Reading by audience Start here: the walk through The operator's guide Tutorial: create a UUID Workspace Container (UWC) Public Recorder inputs Sponsors: your first agent |
| The specification Contents: parts, tables, diagrams TPS 0.5.0 (declared 2026-10-03, revision 8; machine-optimized text) Decisions (the foundations record, one line each) |
The form of the statement an implementation publishes to claim conformance with GTP, per section 19. This page is the blank form. A filled one is the Claude instance's.
An implementation works down every numbered section below and, on each row, says what fills it: which artifact, which part of it. A slot nothing fills is marked EMPTY and given a reason. Leaving a row out is not allowed, because a table missing a row reads just like a table where that row was filled in.
The statement names the TPS version whose part 6 it is made against, GTP carrying no version of its own (TPS 1.2.6; D174.1), and is republished whenever the implementation's version or that TPS version moves. An implementation leaving any rule of section 7 unfilled is not described as conforming at all.